I find it kinda liberating that no one reads this blog. Sure, I would love to be a famous writer, with fans telling me how much they wish they could write like I do, but hey, let's be realistic; I am no writer. I'd like to be, heck, one day I know I will be. But until I train myself more, I put more effort into it, there isn't a chance of me picking up some fans.
But, like I said; it's liberating like this; I can write whatever and whenever I feel without worrying about how someone might take it.

Now, this post is going to be topsy-turvy, swinging out on loads of different branches. I'd apologise but at least it's more natural than planning it all. See I am back at university now, with a bucket load of work happening so the less structure in this, the better. I spent yesterday writing a thousand word essay on Third World Aid. It took me all day because of the structure and wording. Not that I'm complaining too much; one day for an essay - that's pretty good timing. I feel good about it and still have a week before I need to hand it in so plenty of time to fix it later. My gripe is just that it was meant to be an opinion piece and I think my opinion wavers each time I come back to the topic.
Do you think wealthy states should give assistance to less developed countries? It's a simple question, one that I would hope it wouldn't take a long time to answer. And yet, when I asked students here at uni, quite a few went 'um...no?' or 'hell no! Why is it our responsibility?!' Don't get me wrong, I'm all for having an opinion, I'm not going to fault your choice but I may ridicule it.
Firstly; why is it our responsibility? Well, mainly people, it's because a lot of these countries are poor, corrupt and ill-managed because of us! Because of the British or French Empires, because of American or Russian hegemony, because of China's exploitation! We wealthy states went across to these poor countries and practically stripped them of resources, of Independence and of free choice. Britain, France, Germany, Belgium; they all ruined cultures of Africa and Asia and then left those countries in varying states of disarray without care. That is why it's our responsibility. Just like it is America's responsibility because the hundreds of million people there exploited the poor, turning arable forest land dead after stripping it of all the resources they could get at the lowest possible prices.
And, even if we to ignore the fact that we are responsible for the poverty these people live in, how bout the fact that we are rich whilst they are poor? What about the idea that all beings are equal, but some are just luckier than others; we were born into wealthier families and so we should help those less fortunate? Human rights, guys, moral beliefs and reasoning! The elite over in Africa have become rich by ruling corruptly and filtering off money and resources from the government and people. Now, we can't stop them easily without crossing their sovereign lines which very few nations will do without having some interest in it for them, but we can try and help the grassroot levels, the local communities. And we should. There should be no question about whether or not we should help, it's a definite yes, we should and we will. Otherwise we condemn them to a life of probable hardship and poverty whilst we live it up in the West.
Apologies for the rant, but hopefully I made my point.
I feel the need to write more on this post but I know it will become a giant text without interest so perhaps I shall just begin another one in a few minutes. I've decided that sometimes, rather than writing a big post, I may just jot down a few lines, a thought bubble if you will. Who knows - no planning:D



